Donate to Brooks Historical

Monday, February 18, 2013

Edward Moseley: Impressions of the Albemarle

1708/9 Map of the Albemarle by Edward Moseley


Edward Moseley may have been a controversial conservative politician in North Carolina at a time when any educated "gentleman" might get away with anything, but one thing's for certain... he was a well-educated surveyor as well.  

The image here is of a map of the Albemarle or Roanoke Sound region in North Carolina that Moseley produced not long after his arrival in April 1704 from Charleston.  He worked there after arriving from London around 1700 as a court clerk for Gov. James Moore and as a librarian for Dr. Thomas Bray and the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts (SPG).  The SPG (founded in 1701 by the Archbishop of Canterbury Thomas Tenison) was a religious wing of the Anglican state church whose mission since the Vestry Act of 1703 was to restore the Church of England in the colonies and rid them of dissenters.  Like today's class struggles, rich planters of the Albemarle supported this, but the common people of Albemarle, used to a more egalitarian freedom, certainly did not.  As historian Noeleen McIlveena writes "A detailed narrative of the conflicts in Albemarle illustrates the tangible strategies southern planters adopted to counter resistance and to fortify their wealth and privilege."  

Planters ideals of a slave society clashed with those found in the Albemarle's egalitarianism, "who battled the expansionistic slave society" that invaded the South, mostly from Barbados planters.  From McIlveena's point of view, the period 1660-1713 was a "tale of almost continual struggle" between conservative and liberal (somewhat analogous to Tory and Whig) forces in the colony.  John Culpepper, John Gibbs, and even a Lord Proprietor, Seth Sothel fomented rebellions in North Carolina... all hampered its development throughout this period.  Government proceedings were generally held in personal homes on the frontier because the money for public facilities never materialized.  The reason that McIlveena's book stopped at 1713 was because the Tuscarora War became a turning point for political affairs in the colony.  That required another book.  At that time, a major impediment to colonial expansion (big bucks for the British) was essentially eliminated... the Indian.  Afterwards, Tories (as large, wealthy families) and the SPG (established Anglican arm of government) drove home the message of the Vestry Act and conservatism entrenched itself in the colony.  

For the most part, conservatives won the battle, driving Quakers and other dissidents into the background.  Still, a powerful liberal force developed in Britain within a couple of decades and the repression calmed a bit... only a bit.  Unfortunately for the egalitarian folks, Moseley and his "Family" syndicate stuck around in the Lower Cape Fear, fought in the Revolution, became governors and other officials (as well as ex-Confederate soldiers) and tried to take over Wilmington at gunpoint in 1898... generally caused a lot more trouble...  AND took over colonial and state politics.  These guys wrote a slightly different version of our history, too.  Here's another blog entry that goes into this aspect.

I'm sure that you've probably noticed our peculiar conservative trend... lol

It was into this early ungovernable maelstrom that Edward Moseley originally came, proud but penniless, to build his fortunes in Carolina.  He was born in 1682 in St Giles, Cripplegate parish of London, raised in an orphanage because his father, John, died while he was a boy... a really nice orphanage, however, for wealthy orphans... with a superb education at the Royal Mathematical School as one of Christ's Hospital's "Blue-boys," referring to the long blue coats worn by the students.  He studied navigation from lessons provided by Isaac Newton himself!  Meant to be apprenticed to mariner Jacob Foreland for three years on the trade to Bilbao, Spain, rich friends, instead, bought out his apprenticeship in 1697 and he came to Carolina soon after... maybe with James Moore himself... who may also have toted John Lawson on his first trip to America in 1700.  Imagine the two surveyors together on a long sea voyage... maybe that's what turned them against each other.  :)  Thus, North Carolina gained much... and suffered greatly by his influence.  It's a matter of opinion... depending on your political slant.

I still think that Moseley might have been the reason that Lawson left Charles Town so early to explore Carolina, finally to arrive at his historical destination in Bath County, North Carolina.  :)

Nonetheless, we know much of North Carolina's early history due to Moseley's early presence here... and his maps!  One of these maps has been recently discovered (re-found) by the Lambeth Palace Library and printed in their publication in 2010.  A professor friend of mine, Dr. Larry Tise, a North Carolina scholar, among many other talents, found this map and brought it to my attention.  

It is now that we have three wonderful impressions of the same area of North Carolina, all drawn by the same individual and representing his various motivations through this period of conflict.  This is worth a study!

The second map available is incomplete as far as the Albemarle region is concerned.  It covers only the area along the Virginia border that Moseley helped to survey (if a shortened trip) in 1728.  In this Boedlian Library version, he lists the habitations of various settlers and locations of Indians.  


1728 Map of the Dividing Line by Edward Moseley
The third map is one more familiar to modern scholars... the 1733 map of fame that informed decades of North Carolinians and their British authorities of the values of settling in this colony.  It may also have gained more wealth for Moseley and his in-laws, as well.  This copy comes from the North Carolina Archives in Raleigh. 


1733 Moseley Map of North Carolina - Albemarle portion

Taking these three maps, I'd like to study this area through Moseley's eyes and through the troubled times in which he lived and worked.  I shall divide this study into a county by county treatment to facilitate detailed views in these maps.  This is part of a larger work that I am doing on Edward Moseley and his Carolina world.  This blog article includes a watered down summary of the section on Chowan Precinct...


Chowan Precinct

The 1708 Map... 
 
1708 Moseley Map of the Albemarle - Chowan Precinct portion
Before Bertie Precinct came along in 1722, Chowan Precinct extended west over the Chowan River, here represented as "Chowanoake."  Settlement here involved a close relationship with three Indian nations: the Meherrin, the Chowanoke, and (more distant) the Tuscarora.  For the most part, these peoples lived on the west bank of the Chowan, having given up or sold their lands to early settlers like Nathaniel Batts or George Durant.

Of note here, the Nottoway River is paired with the name "Weyanoke," a point of contention in the "dividing line affair" when Phillip Ludwell and Nathaniel Harrison made their report.

"Coll. Pollock's" plantation is here on Salmon Creek.   William Duckenfield is just across Salmon Creek from Pollock, on the land that Nicholas Comberford had indicated as "Batt's House" in 1657.  Interestingly enough, this is the same location on which British authorities have lately located a small patch affixed to John White's 1587 watercolor map with a fort drawn beneath it.  That's an interesting find.

The most obvious mistake on this early map is the geographical configuration of the future town of Edenton, at this time, with no name.  Edenton was incorporated in 1715 as "The Towne on Queen Anne's Creek." It was later known as "Ye Towne on Mattercommack Creek" and, yet later as "The Port of Roanoke." It was renamed "Edenton" in 1722 in honor of Governor Charles Eden who had died that year.

In this interpretation, the shore that Edenton rests upon faces almost directly west, when in reality, it faces south.  It is interesting because this is where Moseley lives, denoted on the map by "Sedes Auth."  "Vaile" and "Porter" also refer to various future in-laws, Jeremiah Vail and John Porter.  He should have known this area quite well.  He was still new to Carolina, however.

Ominously, the area of present Edenton is marked as "Coll. Cary," alluding to Thomas Cary of South Carolina, for whom the "Cary Rebellion" was named.  Apparently, he occupied a central location in what would become the seat of government.  It's possible that many already looked at it this way, although meetings were still held in individual plantation homes.  Alluding to its importance, it also tells the location of a church that Moseley had great interest in promoting... the Anglican church of St. Paul's Parish.  At this time, like the future Edenton, the church had not been completely finished.  This was arguably one reason for Moseley's making the map, as well as promoting himself with the SPG.

Moseley sent this map to Britain along with Rev. William Gordon who left North Carolina after only a year in rather a hurry to escape the irreligious nature of the inhabitants.  He wrote in 1709 to John Chamberlain, Secretary of the SPG that:

Chowan is the westernmost, the largest and thinnest seated; they built a church some years ago, but it is small, very sorrily put together, and is ill looked after; and, therefore, I prevailed with them to build another, which they went about when I came away. The plan of it I brought over, and was desired to procure, if possible, from the society, as much glass as will be necessary for the windows, which by computation will amount to 325 feet.

Despite the lackluster opinion, St. Paul's Parish Church, then, owes quite a bit to Rev. Gordon.  Perhaps Moseley had reasoned in 1708 that the SPG would be able to help them pay for certain church supplies and that was his primary motivation... to incur favor with the SPG, perhaps to flatter the Archbishop himself.  That would soon become a forlorn hope. 

Still, the presence of "Coll. Cary" on top of what would become Edenton indicates that Cary was working to take over the government even at the time that this map was made, in 1708.  Do the North Carolina Colonial Records back this up?

As a matter of fact, they do.  Thomas Pollock complained in 1708:

"Notwithstanding which fair election, Mr Moseley not approving of the choice, he with those others being in all but sixty five, would needs name other five by themselves, and Mr Moseley and some others of his party making all the confusion they could in the time of election, and endeavouring to stir up strife and quarrels among the people, which if Col Pollock (being on a plantation of his that joined on the election field) had not hindered and pursuaded the people to keep the peace, would have ended in blows."

So, even as the map made its way across the Atlantic, Moseley stirred up trouble for the very people he made the map for... the SPG! 

In 1709, the Minutes of the Vestry show "Ordered that the way and method of beautifying the Church be left to Descretion of the Church Wardens for the year ensuing Viz enlarging repairing &c" and "Ordered that the Collector of this precinct do collect from each Tythable the sum of two shillings and Nine Pence. which rise sufficient to pay the publick Debts here mentioned and will advance the sum of twelve pounds towards the beautifying of the Chappell over and above the charge of the Collection."  

So, it would appear that the Wardens of the Vestry, of which Moseley belonged, was engaged in this purpose.  Cary, however, changed everything with his coup d’état.

Moseley had joined forces with Cary.  Archbishop of Canterbury Thomas Tenison, who, early in its development, personally presided over meetings of the SPG, apparently thought this map a painful reminder of how Moseley sided with the Quaker faction, or at least the side that the Quakers supported.

Someone may have removed his name from the map... for maps were important tools at this time and Moseley's name may have caused some difficulty after the rebellion.  Then again, a friend of mine suggest that John Lawson may have joined Gordon for the weeks-long trip across the Atlantic and erased it to further his own ambitions.  Even though Moseley had made it, it still helped Tenison to understand the problems there and would have been used by him.  That explains how it was found in some miscellaneous papers of Tenison's regarding the SPG in Lambeth Palace's holdings. 


1708 Moseley map portion showing the bottom line of wording, which contains Moseley's name (beginning), significantly blotted out, yet the lined border around the wording nor any other wording appears largely unaffected.  His name was likely removed to possibly avoid embarrassment after the Cary Rebellion association became understood which immediately followed this map's arrival in London.

The 1728 Map...


1729 Map of the Dividing Line (portion) Chowan Precinct area.



The first major difference noticeable in this map is the extraordinarily different representation that Moseley gives to the Chowan River, which he calls "Chowan" in 1728, instead of "Chowanoake."  After all, Moseley had twenty more years of surveying experience in this colony.  He obviously understood it better than he did in 1708, after only four years of residency.  

On the west bank, he clearly notes a "Nansemond Indian Town" that he also notes five years later on his map of 1733.  He does not indicate the area south of this town, east of the Chowan River, that holds the Meherrin Indian Town and their territory across the river to the west.  

The purpose of mapping the line was, of course, to gain a better understanding of where it lay because of land disputes and an erroneous belief by Virginians that it ran much further south into North Carolina than it actually did.  Moseley adamantly charged that it did not and that the surveys he, as surveyor-general since 1723 and deputy of William Maule before that, had conducted truly lay within his own colony and not that of Virginia.  

As a result can be seen here the variation from the line from Currituck 2'30" from north toward the south to meet with the conjunction of the Nottoway and Chowan Rivers.  Note on this map that "Weyonoake" does not appear since it had been determined that they had left the area and the Nottoway had taken their place.  Here, also, the name of the Chowan changes to "Black Water River."  

As can be seen on Nicholas Comberford's 1657 map, however, "Weyanoke River" and "Blackwater Creek" do indeed meet at that same location.  Weyanoke=Nottoway.  



1657 Comberford Map (portion) showing that Weyanoke River is the Nottoway River.  Even the Weyanoke Town is indicated in the upper right.
A number of settlers just north of the line are indicated here.  A "W. Speight" next to "Speight's land" is indicated by Moseley just inside Virginia.  A 1696 patent to Thomas Speight, son and heir of Captain William Speight, mentions a Chowan deed on Bennett's Creek, indicated here by a road leading southward to it.  The older William Speight held 320 acres south of the dividing line in the northern part of Chowan that later became Gates County, the portion that shows here on Moseley's map.  This land was near present Sunbury, about eight miles SE of the location of "W. Speight" on this map.

This land was surveyed in 1695 by Samuel Swann, the second husband of Elizabeth Lillington, daughter of Alexander Lillington, whose third husband was Maurice Moore.  This made Samuel Swann's children neices and nephews of Edward Moseley after his marriage to Elizabeth's sister Ann Lillington Walker, the wife of Henderson Walker, acting governor of North Carolina when he died in 1704.   

This near-line occurrence may be explained since the Speights lived in Suffolk, Virginia, directly north of Gates County prior to moving to Bennetts Creek.  Still, William was born in Speight's Run, over ten miles north of the dividing line.  

In the deeds of Virginia, we find:

"10 November 1678. William Speight. Patent for 176 A. in Upper Parish of Nanzemond Co., at a place called Barbica; adjoyning Humphrey Griffin, neer the Crosse Swamp, etc. (NugII, pp. 193-194)"


"Cross Swamp" may refer to the lands of "J. Cross," seen on Moseley's map also north of the line.  That Moseley indicated the Speight land running south of the line may be a clue as to Virginia having patented land in North Carolina.  This exonerates Moseley historically for he had successfully satisfied Virginian William Byrd II, who accompanied the surveyors on this expedition:

"It must be owned, the report of those gentlemen was severe upon the then commissioners of North Carolina, and particularly upon Mr. Moseley. I will not take it upon me to say with how much justice they said so many hard things, though it had been fairer play to have given the parties accused a copy of such representation, that they might have answered what they could for themselves.
 

But since that was not done, I must beg leave to say thus much in behalf of Mr. Moseley, that he was not much in the wrong to find fault with the quadrant produced by the surveyors of Virginia, because that instrument placed the mouth of Nottoway river in the latitude of 37 degrees; whereas, by an accurate observation made since, it appears to lie in 36° 30' 30'', so that there was an error of near 30 minutes, either in the instrument or in those who made use of it.
 

Besides, it is evident the mouth of Nottoway river agrees much better with the latitude, wherein the Carolina charter supposed Weyanoke creek, (namely, in or about 36° 30',) than it does with Wicocon creek, which is about fifteen miles more southerly."

The 1733 Map... 

 
1733 Moseley Map of North Carolina (portion) Chowan Precinct

It is very apparent, that by 1733, Edward Moseley had learned a great deal about North Carolina.  This is an interesting map in its own right and I have many theories on why Moseley put it together.  Part of those were personal.  He wanted money, of course, and this map detailed land that was available to newcomers and otherwise potential buyers.  It also served him to make his "surveys," but we'll explore that in a moment. 

Overall, the 1733 map demonstrates that the colony is growing, despite the mutinous nature of its inhabitants.  Tory influence always helps business, at least.  Brunswick Town, Beaufort, Edenton, and Bath Town are new towns developed since 1708.   Wilmington is just then getting started and identified by the notation "Watson" on the east side of the Cape Fear River, across from the thoroughfare, named for the first person to receive a grant there from Burrington, John Watson in 1733 (patented in 1735 due to confusion with the records during the political troubles with the Family).  
Craven, Carteret, Onslow, Edgecombe, Bertie, Hyde, Beaufort, and New Hanover are all new precincts.  Insets show Port Brunswick or Cape Fear Harbour, Port Beaufort or Topsail Inlet, Ocacock (Ocracoke) Inlet, Explanation, and Directions for Ocacock (Ocracoke) Inlet.

Moseley extolls the virtues of North Carolina in the center of the map:

"This Country abounds with Elks & Buffalos at the distance of about 130 miles from the Sea & the whole affords plenty of deer, swine, bever, wild Cows & Horses.  Also Turkeys, partridges and all sort of water-fowl, with abundance of Swans.  The Rivers & Sea Coast are well stored with fish of all kinds, especially Sturgeon. The soil is naturally fertile, producing plenty of Peaches & Plumbs, Apples, Pears, and other delicious fruits and Eatables, without Art or Expense.  Its chief trading produce is Pitch, Tar, Skins, Pork, Indian-Corn, Cedar, Ship-Timber, and Bark."

It made for a great advertisement to encourage settlement in the colony.  Another note at the bottom of the map might interest prospective settlers concerned about safety, especially following the Tuscarora War:

"... nor is there any danger from Indians, none now inhabiting the Sea Coast but about 6, or 8, at Hatteras, who dwell among the English."

Albemarle, specifically, has "Chappels" and Courthouses dotting the map along the roads leading through the various counties/precincts of the Albemarle and along the waterfront areas bordering the Roanoke Sound.  Edenton is clearly marked as a well-formed city.  This map, held by East Carolina University is the only copy of this map in the United States; the other three are all located in England.  The intrepid Dr. Larry Tise of ECU and the University of Pennsylvania has already made a trip to London to see these beauties! 

The interesting history surrounding this copy, found in an attic in Edenton in 1982, surrounds the ascension of the Whig Robert Walpole to position of first minister in Britain, along with his close associates, two Pelham brothers, one Thomas Holles-Pelham, the duke of Newcastle, made Secretary of the Southern Department a few years before the Lords Proprietors decided to sell North Carolina to the crown.  This was officially in July 1729.  After that event, the liberal Whigs in government eschewed the old Tories, including their practices in favor of more efficiency in finance and patronage or favors.  It seems that Tory (actually, wealthy and powerful families) favorites like Charles Town in South Carolina had been far too much trouble for the Crown and they did not want North Carolina following that path.  The SPG's Anglican conversion fervor subsided somewhat and Quakers found themselves feeling more at ease.  What's more, Newcastle attempted to right the wrongs that the Tory, Moseley, and his Anglican South Carolinian "Family" had been perpetrating in the Lower Cape Fear as part of their Brunswick settlement. South Carolina tried to gain a foothold on the Cape Fear River, the only accessible river that North Carolina possessed.  If North Carolina had any hope of competing with other colonies, it was the Cape Fear River.  The Family put that in danger. 

The Brunswick settlement was an autonomous and illegal pseudo-colony along the confused South Carolina border that grew enormously by 1728 through Sir Richard Everard's illegal "blank patents."  During its development, the Family avoided proper land grant procedures, buying and selling property amongst themselves, and confusing the provenance of that property beyond recovery.  They also neglected to pay the rent.  This was the part that probably upset Newcastle the most.  Edward Moseley once again drew accusations that mostly concerned his surveying malpractice:


  • Mr. Lovick, and his two confederates Moseley and Wm. Little, ye Receiver General, to sign many pattents wherein ye number of acres are left blank…
  • … practices by Mr Moseley and his Deputies in returning to the Secretaries office Immaginary Surveys by which his relations hold great quantities of land more than are specified in their patents…
  • [Mr. Lovick] advised Sir Richard to grant no more Patents but by the Artifice and management of Mr Moseley then Surveyor Sir Richard did continue to issue Patents on which the Said Moseley and his Kindred were the most considerable gainers… 
  • Moseley and his Relations have in four or five years time strangely enriched themselves.  
  • Edward Moseley, Surveyor General of the late Lords Proprietors, and his Deputys, more especially Mr. John Ashe [deputy-surveyor in the Lower Cape Fear] etc. had been guilty of many vile frauds, and abuses in surveying ; one of their practices was, to survey without warrants for gratifications… 
  • Moseley when Surveyor did make surveys in his own house, and plotted out land upon paper, with bounds by waters, trees and other signs, and tokens, that he never saw, nor knew anything off, includeing much more then in the returns sett forth, for which patents went out in course. 
  • Moseley in confederacy with some of the Council endavoured to stir up divisions in the Assembly and to prevent it from doing business, hoping thereby to put off any enquiries into the frauds he had been guilty of while Surveyor General etc. 
  • There have been for several years past very corrupt doings in the Secretary's office concerning the lands, transacted by Lovick and Edwd. Moseley, Surveyor Genl. 

All of these accusations found in the North Carolina Colonial Records were probably true.  I have proven some, including the fact that he did not always survey warrants, but drew them from his map, presumably the one he worked on to promote his Family business, the map of 1733.  

He made this map under royal supervision of Governor George Burrington, literally a Scottish "bulldog" placed in the colony to disrupt the schemes of the politically powerful conservative Family.  

Moseley was an old pro when it came to kissing the royal arse and he immediately saw which way the wind was blowing... that might have been Thomas Pelham-Holles, duke of Newcastle, if it had not been for another governor having been commissioned March 27, 1733 to replace the increasingly paranoid Burrington (he thought that Family member Nathaniel Rice wanted to murder him... he probably did).  Newcastle himself did not receive notice until April 5. 

By this time, Moseley's map was on its way to Britain to be engraved by John Cowley.  Moseley could not have known that Burrington was being replaced so quickly.  Still, he must have got word to Cowley to change the dedication to reflect the new dedication to "Gabriel Johnston."  It would be interesting to see the name that was on it before.  I seriously doubt that Moseley would have liked it to have been "George Burrington" after he had voided Family property on the Cape Fear River to establish the port of New Town, later Wilmington, North Carolina.


1733 Moseley Map - cartouche dedicating the map to Gov. Gabriel Johnston

Independent researcher and Moseley map expert, Mike McNamara, had this to say about the map of 1733 in his article, "A New and Correct Map of the Province of North Carolina: The Discovery of a 1737 North Carolina Manuscript Map":

The Moseley map was undoubtedly highly anticipated. In May of 1735, a year and a half before it became available, Charleston, South Carolina printer Lewis Timothy advertised, “New and correct Maps of NORTH-CAROLINA by Edward Mosely [sic], dedicated to His Excellency the present Governor of the said Province, to be sold by the Printer hereto."  Two years later, the map was offered for sale in the Virginia Gazette, described as “very large Map, (being Five Feet long, and Four Feet broad, on Two Sheets of Elephant Paper) it’s not only Useful, but Ornamental, for Gentlemens Halls, Parlours, or Stair-cases”

The only American copy of the Moseley map of 1733 made the rounds.  Gov. Arthur Dobbs, serving North Carolina from 1753-1765 as the sixth royal governor after George Burrington, favored this map so much that he was painted holding it:


Ok... you don't believe me... here:


  What does it say on that map?  This ends the summary of the Chowan part of the map story.  More to come later!








-------------------------------------------------------------









Dethroning the Kings of Cape Fear: Consequences of Edward Moseley's Surveys

Purchase an e-copy for $5 or get a print version among more titles by B. C. Brooks






















Aristocratic Pyrates of the Albemarle

Purchase an e-copy for $5 or get a print version among more titles by B. C. Brooks

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brunswick Town and Wilmington

 Purchase an e-copy for $5 or get a print version among more titles by B. C. Brooks

 

 

 

 

Sunday, February 17, 2013

William Maule of Scotland: Eighteenth-Century Surveyor-General of "Mutinous" North Carolina

Title: "This Plane as here delineated and Layed Out represents the Island of Roan-Oak in North Carolina Containing Twelve Thousand Acres of Land and Marsh. As Surveyed Anno 1718 by Wm. Maule, Surye. Genl."

There were a number of Maules in both Scotland and England in the latter part of the seventeenth century; however, Patrick Maule, or "Dr. Patrick Maule," as he is styled in the North Carolina Colonial Records arrived in America in 1715.  This is a significant date for it may be associated with the First Jacobite Rebellion, a.k.a. "The Fifteen," because of its occurrence in 1715.  Many Jacobites left the country as a result... many were shipped to America unwillingly or fled there themselves.

Whether Patrick was an actual doctor and what kind of doctor is not revealed in the records, nor in his 1736 will in North Carolina.  What kind of doctor raises hogs and makes turpentine?  Well... a fugitive Jacobite doctor, maybe... [BCBNote 8 Sep 2020: As it turns out, most doctors in America had farms and raised chickens or were alternatively paid in eggs, chickens, and other farm produce up until the 20th century! My work at Laupus Library's medical collections at ECU made me greatly aware of this.]

A Maule family researcher in Pennsylvania believes that Patrick and his older brother William to be two of five sons of John Maule, born c1618, descended from Thomas Maule (1470-1513), the progenitor of Patrick Maule, the first Earl of Panmure in Forfarshire, on the east coast of Scotland, near Edinburgh.  Patrick Maule of Panmure was a Tory or royalist who served James VI, king of Scotland as Groom of the Bedchamber before and after he became James I of England, beginning the Stuart line of English royalty.  Fealty to the English line of kings was not a constant in the Maules of Scotland, many who lost their lands as a result of their support of the pretender in the Jacobite Rebellion of the early eighteenth century.  That occurred at about the time of Patrick's later arrival to join his brother William in North Carolina.  Ironically, many of these Maules reclaimed their family lands in Scotland and swore allegiance once again to the British Crown.  

Maule Estate of Panmure, before and after it was destroyed.
  Needless to say, Maules were strongly supportive of Stuart kings, Charles I, Charles II, and his bother James II.  Charles II, of course was the one who gave a charter to the eight Lords Proprietors of Carolina in 1663.  The protestant succession of William of Orange in 1689 prompted many Stuart supporters to seek refuge in America.  Still, Maules, even in America remained Tory and faithful to Stuart England.  

A Thomas Maule settled in Massachusetts in 1695 after spending some time in Barbadoes.  He was a devout Quaker who penned a letter to the well-known Cotton Mather in Massachusetts. 
Thomas, b. May 11, 1645 Berkswell Parish, Warwickshire, England, d. July 2, l724 prob. Salem, Mass.  His origins, in his own words, writing in the third person, Thomas Maule says this:

Thomas Maule, a Young Man about twelve years of Age, came from England to the Island of Barbadoes, and from thence (for his health sake) came to New-England, where hearing much preaching and loud praying; he began to think with himself, what manner of People are these? whole Streets ring with the noise of Preaching and Praying; and having lived amongst them about three years he did experience their words to be good, but by their works to have no good hearts; at the end of which time he removed himself to another of their Towns, called Salem, where he found the Church Members to be in all respects (as to Religion) one with them in the other Towns of their Jurisdiction; but in Salem he found a People of few words and good works, agreable thereunto, with which people he Joyned, by keeping to their Meetings...

In other words, he turned Quaker... :)

One early South Carolina Maule was Rev. Robert Maule, who served Charles Town as minister for the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts, an Anglican body of the state church that tried to reassert their authority in the lawless colonies through the vestry act in 1703.  One reason for this were Quakers, becoming quite numerous in the colonies and most especially in North Carolina. 

William Maule, the future surveyor-general of North Carolina first appears as a mariner or merchant delivering letters of Thomas Pollock to William Glover in April 1710, Thomas Pollock to John Lawson in May 1710 (Lawson was in London at the time, publishing his famous book), and Thomas Pollock to Edward Hyde in August 1710 during Pollock's flight to Virginia during Cary's Rebellion... as he said "a government I knew was altogether illegal."  This took Capt. Maule from Virginia to London to Charles Town to make this circuit.  

Capt. Maule had been along the border of Virginia at some point during the intended survey of that border in 1710 and was apparently a deputy surveyor under John Lawson, for the Virginia commissioners complained of his attempt to cheat the Nansemond Indians of their land:

At the Nansemond Town the Interpreter told us that when he went down to Wicocon Creek with a Nansemond Indian called Robin Tucker who was sent by the Indians to shew us the Creek on wch the Wyanoakes formerly lived, he called at one William Williams's house, where he met with one Mr Maul (who is ye same person appointed by Mr Lawson to supply his place at our taking the Latitude) and that being sometime in the House and the Indian left without, as soon as he (the Interpreter) came out, the Indian told him, That man (meaning Mr Maul) was not good for he had been (persuading) him to deny that the Weyanoakes had lived on Wicocon Creek, & promised him two bottles of powder and a thousand shott to do it. Upon wch we examined the Indian charging him not to tell a ly of the Gentleman, & he assured us it was very true. This Mr Maul is Mr Lawson's Deputy Surveyor.

Capt. Maule does not appear in the colony's records for two more years until he shows up, as a surveyor working in the Albemarle area. Despite his cheating the Indians, he was not very controversial to his superiors (who could have cared less about the Indians) and probably favored by Tories in the home government. 

As someone who has explored Edward Moseley's career intently, I'd like to believe that he, who had been a surveyor in the Albemarle since April 1704 and had made a map of the Albemarle in 1708 that was taken by Rev. William Gordon to London for the Bishop of London... which got quietly stuffed into Tenison's SPG records at Lambeth Palace and buried until 2010... probably resented this intrusion by another capable surveyor, especially one that did not favor his politics.  

As it turned out, Moseley's opponent in the Council, Thomas Pollock encouraged the favor of Maule over Moseley.  In Pollock's letter to John Lawson, then (May 1710) in London, Pollock writes:

Also, Sir, I have another favour to beg of you. There being a young gentleman (the bearer hereof) one Mr Wm Maule on whom fortune hath frowned, having been twice taken by the French [on the sea, no doubt] and lost very considerably, and being, I believe, very capable of surveying, (if you have not deputed any other in Albemarle county or at least in Chowan precinct) you will find him (if it lie within your conveniency to depute him) capable, diligent, and faithful, and it will be a very great obligation to...Yr St Sr.  

After all, the well-trained Moseley, with Lawson and his new deputy, William Maule, had been appointed by the Queen as commissioners to determine the boundary between Virginia and North Carolina in 1710.  The journal of Phillip Ludwell and Nathaniel Harrison, commissioners for Virginia, a document in which we learn of Maule's cheating the Nansemond Indians, however, demonstrates the inability of Moseley and Lawson to work together and their growing hatred for one another.  We also need to remember that Maule was now Lawson's deputy, who was now hated even more by Moseley (not because of the Indians - Moseley cared nothing for their welfare any more than Maule). 

This prompted historian Noeleen McIlveena to comment on their probable professional/personal distaste of each other in her book, A Very Mutinous People.  It may also have caused the Queen to have ignored the pretentious and arrogant Moseley in favor of the loyal and amenable Indian-cheating William Maule.  It probably made the map that he sent by Rev. William Gordon to the SPG a little less palatable to the Crown.  Gordon left after little more than a year (in a huff) because of Quaker opposition, specifically John Porter, at least a friend to the Quakers, and it would seem, to Edward Moseley.  Moseley's name at the bottom of the map seems to have been purposely removed... but, this is just my guess (see second figure below). 


1708 Moseley Map of the Albemarle, printed in
1708 Moseley map portion showing the bottom line of wording, which contains Moseley's name (beginning), significantly blotted out, yet the lined border around the wording nor any other wording appears largely unaffected.  His name was likely removed to possibly avoid embarrassment after the Cary Rebellion association became understood which immediately followed this map's arrival in London.


Once Moseley got wind of this, he may have lost his Anglican religion. Trust me... he seldom had need of it anyway!  lol 

Whatever the politics, Moseley was probably held in low esteem by her majesty, Queen Anne.  I can't be sure of this (find real documentation), for the Board of Trade seemed more interested in violations of the Navigation Acts in regard to "an illegal trade carried on between Carolina [Charleston] and Portugal." They mentioned little else but the boundary issue until after John Lawson was murdered in September 1711 and the Tuscarora War had begun.  In short, they could have cared less about some Indian matter or dispute in the colonies. 

Still, William Maule gained the most advantage (right away), especially after his service to the lackluster northern part of the colony as a "Colonel" in the Tuscarora War - something that we would never find Moseley doing (Edit 8 Sep 2020: probably bone-spurs or something) - and growing friendship with President of the Council (and Moseley's enemy) Thomas Pollock.  

During the war, Maule began patenting a lot of land along the Chowan-Roanoke River areas that later became Bertie Precinct (then, County) by 1722.  On 1 April 1713, he obtained four separate 640-acre tracts on the south side of the Moratock (Roanoke) River.  All four of these tracks together were known as "Callidonia," reflecting the old Roman name for Scotland, "Caledonia."  

The war had opened up huge areas of Indian land southwest of Albemarle.  Tuscarora, Chowan, and Meherrin were largely grouped along the border (to defend against other Indians in Virginia) just west of the Chowan River. Especially after the war, English colonists here no longer felt the need to respect their sovereignty.  Maule was no better than Moseley and was never much concerned with their rights anyway.    

Two more 640-acre tracts came 5 May 1714 on the north side of the Meherrin River near the Virginia border (and in disputed territory until the boundary was settled) and including the mouth of a "mill creek." Later, in October of 1722, he increased his "Callidonia" lands by 3,000 acres in one grant, perhaps the traditional large grant allowed a surveyor-general.  

His brother Patrick received about 5,000 acres of land in five grants, issued between 1719 and 1726 on the north side of Pamlico Sound in "Bath County" or the part that later became Hyde County.  Many more land transactions are listed in the patent books, abstracted in the Province of North Carolina by Margaret Hofmann.

In May 1714, Maule obtained his commission as surveyor-general of North Carolina, just before Queen Anne passed away that August.  Maule was mentioned in 1713 as "Captn Maul our present Surveyor," but most likely that was due to succession after Lawson's untimely death by "severe lightwood splinter torture" in 1711... stirred up I believe by Moseley and his confederates, as also Thomas Pollock believed at the time.  

Yes, Pollock certainly believed Moseley and his confederates capable of this...

The phrases "three restless Incendiaries Colo Cary, Mr Porter, and Mr Moseley from having any share in the Government, which is all the punishment we pray may be inflicted for many crimes and misdemeanours they are justly chargeable with" and "incite rebellions, Conspiracys Riotts or any manner of unlawfull Feuds or differences thereby to stir up against or malitiously to contrive the Ruin and Disturbance of the Queen's peace" and "carry on their rebellious purposes have endeavoured by promises of reward to draw into their conspiracy the neighbouring Indians by them to cut off all such of her majesty's subjects as should oppose their lawless proceedings" generally tell the tale... all surveyors stood to make a bundle by getting rid of the Indians.  Personally, Moseley stood to have revenge (and more money) by getting rid of John Lawson.  It only took a simple whisper in Chief Hancock's ear about who carved up tens of thousands of acres of their lands for the New Bern settlement... " Pssst!  "Lawson's on the Neuse now with Gov. Edward Hyde [actually, Christopher von Graffenried, founder of New Bern]!" 

Oh, but no politician would ever do this!!!  [Sarcasm alert!] Especially when there's no media around to catch you... especially when the maximum population in that WHOLE God-foresaken wilderness colony was at most 3,000!!  We could certainly trust a pretentious rich kid in that environment.  Right?  lol  That's what I thought... :)

After Lawson's nasty slow torturous murder (you get the idea that it sucked to be him in 1711, right?), Maule merely succeeded to the post until an official appointment could be made.  Shortly afterward, in 1715, William's brother Dr. Patrick Maule arrived and helped his brother as a deputy surveyor and the colony as deputy receiver, under Lords Proprietor's receiver-general Daniel Richardson.  

Again, this must ROYALLY have stewed the highly educated and presumptuous Edward Moseley, a proper gentleman who should be shown deference! Oh, well!  :)

Where William Maule may have received his education as a navigator/surveyor is not known, although Scots and Dutch share similar early maritime interests and a Thomas Maule has been found in the late seventeenth century (1663) graduating from Leiden University, popular with the Dutch royal family that was founded by William of Orange, later king of England.  Two other Maules graduated from there in 1718 and 1725.  It is known that Scots have been great mariners and merchants even before England became known for their prowess on the sea.  In The Safeguard of the Sea: A Naval History of Britain, N. A. M. Rodger states:

Up to the 1550s at least, Scottish seamen were well in advance of the English.  They regularly made long open sea passages while the English remained tied to coastal waters.  There were close Scottish links with Dieppe and Le Havre, where in the 1530s and 1540s a brilliant school of Huguenot navigators, explorers and pirates flourished.  Many Scots were among them, and Scottish ships and seamen participated in their raids to the Caribbean.
 

From 1718 map, showing William Maule's signature. 

Despite his probable education and ability, Maule made few maps - the one of Roanoke Island in 1718 is the only known map attributed to him, and he probably made that one because he owned a large part of it at the time (see second portion).  It appears somewhat crude by comparison to Edward Moseley's works, especially the 1733 map for which he later becomes famous... it seems that, by this time, Moseley, graduate of the Royal Mathematical Academy in London who studied lessons provided by Isaac Newton, warranted further attention from the new monarch, George II.  

"Mr. Maules Part" or property on the 1718 Roanoke Island map.

Maule laid out a 53,000-acre tract for the Tuscarora Indian remnants and Chowan Indians in 1717 in Bertie County, at the behest of the government and Indian agent, William Charleton.  This became known as the Indian Woods Reservation.  The Bertie County Rootsweb site states: "Bounded by the Roanoke River and Roquist Creek, the reservation contained some of the more fertile land of the county, and it was not long before whites began to encroach upon this territory. As early as 1721 interlopers threatened to "create Feuds and disturbances" among the Indians." 

1803 Plan of Indian Woods


The Tuscaroras packed up and left for New York the next year, after numerous Englishmen had cheated them of these lands.  Maule spent 21 days away from home to perform this work, as he stated later.

Col. William Maule spent more than 23 years as a surveyor for North Carolina; his official term as surveyor-general ended in June 1723, when the even more controversial Edward Moseley finally received royal recognition of his talents and became surveyor-general of the colony upon the appointment of George Burrington as governor.  This appointment was, of course, due to politics as well. Burrington politically allied himself with the "Family," a group of wealthy gentlemen (many from South Carolina) who intended to open up the Lower Cape Fear for settlement - something that the Lords Proprietors rejected at the time. Moseley was a leading member of that elite cabal. Also, there just weren't that many choices in North Carolina of this time... lol

William Maule patented his own lands in Bertie County and lived there on the "Mount Golland" tract with his wife, Penelope Eden, the daughter of governor Charles Eden.  He kept a ferry over the Chowan River as well.  An aging 58-year-old Maule had received some flack for trying again to cheat Indians... this time, the Meherrin in 1726.  The Maules had one daughter together, Penelope, before he passed away that same year of the Meherrin troubles.  His wife later married John Lovick and then Gabriel Johnston, another governor of North Carolina in 1734.  His brother, Patrick passed away two years later, in 1736, leaving only one son, John, to carry the name of Maule in North Carolina, formerly of the Earldom of Panmure in Forfarshire, Scotland. 

Edward Moseley was finally pleased. 

---------------------------------------------


Hopefully, at the end of 2017, I will be finished with my newest book: Dictionary of Pyrate Biography, 1713-1720 which will attempt for the first time ever to re-discover pirate history without using A General History. I guarantee a lot of surprises!




Please keep up with updates on my website at baylusbrooks.com.




Meanwhile, visit my Lulu page for already published material, including Quest for Blackbeard! 

Quest for Blackbeard is 15% OFF ALL PRINT FORMATS now at: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/bcbrooks

#blackbeard #pirates #history #maritime







Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Early North Carolina Surveys - Hatteras Island

The Tuscarora War in North Carolina from 1711-1715 was a hellish affair for many European colonists.  Indians attacked without warning, some termed it a “hellish tragedy” and “grossest piece of villainy,” 130 people killed at the head of the Neuse River alone.  According to Christopher Gale’s memorial, colonists faced death at the hands of friends, “esteemed as members of the several families where the mischiefs were done, and that with smiles in their countenances, when their intent was to destroy." 

Needless to say, Hancock's hostile warriors' attacks made an impression and the haste with which these men took to permanently settling Hatteras may have caused more trouble than it was worth!

In 1716, right after the war was over, colonists who had visited the island before for mercantile purposes, began to stake claims on Hatteras Island.  One of these men was John O'Neal:

1716 John O'Neal grant on "Hatteras Banks"

John O'Neal's grant of 1716 consisted partly of the land later granted to "William Elks and the Rest of the Hatteras Indians" in 1759.   Presumably, the famous "Indian Towne" of John Lawson fame rests within this patent, for John O'Neal served as their agent in 1720.  

Drawing this patent or any other survey is usually not a problem.  Unfortunately, early surveys in North Carolina could be VERY inaccurate!  John O'Neal's is no exception.

The bounds are as follows:

"Beginning at ye mouth of Tom King Creek then up the said creek by various courses 320 poles [1 mile] and from the Beginning on the Sound N.45 E. 220 po. to a stake S. 45 E. 320 po. into ye woods to a pine, S. 45 W. 220 po. to ye first station...." 

The first problem that becomes apparent involves "and from the Beginning on the Sound..."... where exactly does this start?  At the end of the travel 320 poles down the creek?  Or is it a continuation of the description for the first line?  If we assume that you go d
own the creek 320 poles FIRST, then you have a rectangular plot of land that starts one mile down the creek with an open side... which doesn't make any sense.  


Logic suggests that this phrase refers to the next boundary of "N. 45 E. 220 poles."  When you do this, you get a rectangular plot that begins from the Sound's edge straight into the island's interior, where you might, inded, find "woods."  So, drawing it this way, we have:

1716 O'Neal plot on a map of Hatteras Island showing the actual run of Tom King's Creek

Once we see the plot on the map above, we begin to realize that Tom King's Creek does not run the way that the surveyor originally thought.  Now, if the surveyor was on site, taking this survey, he most likely would have noticed.  The conclusion becomes that he wasn't there, or he took a serious shortcut.  

As it turns out, the North Carolina Colonial Records mentions an aberration in early surveys that may well explain this result.

George Burrington, first royal governor of North Carolina, sent a letter to the duke of Newcastle in 1733, complaining of the colony's surveyor, Edward Moseley, committing a "multitude of frauds and concealments" in his surveys.  One of those involved measuring two points from the shore (shortest distance to walk from their boat, obviously) and assuming the rest of the perfectly rectangular survey... which this one on Hatteras just happens to resemble.  

Not all early surveys were performed so badly... read: illegally.  Still, in a colony full of empty land, who would question the survey in the lifetime of the surveyor.   Of course, if this was done as a matter of course, as Edward Moseley often did in 1733 with his family and their illegal land theft, it soon became apparent to his neighbors... and victims... namely, King George II.   

From the 1883 map of Hatteras, it is easy to see that. from a boat in the Sound, Tom King's Creek appears to run directly SE from the shore.  But, probably beyond the surveyor's sight, the creek turns almost 90 degrees abruptly to the NE.  If you try to connect the open side of the survey with the path of the creek, it becomes an impossible survey.

Therefore, the original meaning of the survey is as shown... as far as we can tell.  The best part is that a rectangle of 320 poles on one side and 220 poles on the others exactly equals 440 acres!  But, since one side was a creek... with meanders and inexact bounds, the land was probably not exactly 440 acres.  Still, it's close enough considering the tremendous errors already incurred. 

There's more, however... yeah, even more!  And this is just where it gets interesting...

Other colonists received grants in the same general area... as a matter of fact, two others received grants that fell on the same lands... they intersected each other.  This error or malfeasance on the surveyor's part actually may have gotten a man killed.

Patrick Callahan obtained another patent in 1716 for the south side of this misinterpreted Tom King’s Creek, adjacent to, or across from, O'Neal.  The misinterpreted creek would have given O'Neal less than his 440 acres and Callahan the portion that O'Neal had lost.  

1716 Patrick Callahan Grant
 
Three weeks later, Callahan and John O’Neale discovered that Henry Davis’ grant boundaries, according to the wording of the grant, overlapped both of theirs.  Davis’ patent had been surveyed at the wrong angle, causing his land to appear to extend across the lands of the other two men at nearly a right angle to the sound shore, rather than running along the shore as originally intended, just north of O'Neal.  There also was not enough land still available northward of O'Neal for Davis to have his full grant once rotated to the proper angle.  The situation was seriously messed up!

1716 Henry Davis Grant
 

This misunderstanding became a serious problem, especially for Henry Davis.  Early Currituck County tax records show that Callahan and Davis both had difficulty paying their taxes on this property and this added financial strain probably heightened their anxiety over the land dispute.  John O'Neal, by contrast, did not appear on the delinquent tax records.  

Callahan must have demanded that he had a right to the land, as opposed to Davis’ claim.  Both were valid claims as originally written and, in fact, Callahan stood to gain more land than he was supposed to have by the grant as originally written.  By 1719, the year following the pirate Blackbeard’s death only miles away, Callihan’s avarice and great financial need fueled a deadly conflict with Henry Davis over both of their badly-surveyed patents.  Callihan “beat cutt & bruise[d Davis] by giving and striking him two Mortall blows and cutts on the head with a certain weapon called a Cymeter or Cuttlash [sic].”    Davis died a few hours later and Patrick Callahan, found guilty of manslaughter, forfeited “all his goods & Chattells for ever and the profits of his Lands for a year and a day [sic].”   This probably resulted in Callihan’s land south of John O’Neale to lapse for lack of payment on his already delinquent taxes for he is never heard from again on Hatteras.  Perhaps the lesser of his punishments involved branding an “M” on his thumb – for “murderer.”  

The disposition of these lands after the fatal dispute must be guessed at, for no one changed the official records to reflect the corrections.  If records had been made of this account, they have not been found.  This is my best guess:



1720 Readjustment of Hatteras Properties Mistaken by Erroneous Surveys


Henry Davis’ patent, now belonging to his young daughter Mary, later wife of Thomas Robb, was probably rotated counterclockwise to allow for John O’Neal’s patent to its south.  The O’Neal patent was subsequently extended across Tom King’s Creek to adjust for the earlier misinterpretation.  This placed Davis’ land on the north shore of Hatteras Island as originally intended, including both King’s and Brooks’ Points.  There was still, however, a problem with the patent that would not reveal itself for decades as Mary Davis grew, married, and gave birth to her son.  

When she came of age, Mary Davis Robb thought that she would possess the marshes and hills north of the Indian Town at Trent Woods, including both King’s and Brooks’ Point.  After all, this was the meaning of her father’s patent.  It is likely that the intent was to leave the town to the care of John O’Neale, who, a few years later, appeared as the Indian’s official agent.  Unbeknownst to all involved, however, Mary Davis’ readjusted patent yet included the Indian town itself... another mistake that would pop up later.

John O’Neale still owned the bulk of the land south of Mary Davis that would later be deeded to the Elks band of Hatteras Indians.  Acting as their agent, on March 1, 1720, O’Neale received “20 lbs pow[d]er and 40 pounds shot with 100 flints” to deliver to them.   The colonial government desired “that they may not be unprovided to serve the publick [sic] if occasions requires,” alluding to their friendly inclinations during the recent war. 

John O’Neale later sold his patent to Samuel Stowe, but no extant deed tells of this.  Still, Stowe's 6 April 1737 sale to John Nelson Junr. of Pasquotank was recorded/copied and records full deed information that, unfortunately, was copied directly from the 1716 record in the patent books readily available to the registrar over 50 miles away.  Hatteras was only accessible by water, making the trip even that much more of a burden and that much less likely to have occurred.  The result?  We still know just as little about this grant as we did before!


6 April 1737 deed of Samuel Stowe to John Nelson Junr. of Pasquotank (portion)
 
That deed information was also slightly miscopied from the original data in the patent book, making the translation of this information that much more difficult without the original.  Sloppy work, huh?  Not me!  Them!  :)

Working with the Lost Colony Research Group over the last two years provided the data and "think tank" help to make this correlation AND the sudden "Eureka!" moment (I can feel the blood pressure rising again!) of recognizing that the old Elks grant was still partially visible on the Dare County GIS during the mapping procedure allowed us to pinpoint the town precisely!  At least, the effects of what these Hatteras folks did lasted through the years in the official county records (even if they were cryptic about it when they did it)...

When I am approached by historians or amateurs and criticized for my lack of detail on these surveys, the explanation/defense is far too long and complex.  Now, I can just link to this blog entry in an email and be off about lunch!  I like eastern North Carolina barbeque... lol.

Have a great day!




---------------------------------------------------------------------






Dethroning the Kings of Cape Fear: Consequences of Edward Moseley's Surveys

Purchase an e-copy for $5 or get a print version among more titles by B. C. Brooks






















Aristocratic Pyrates of the Albemarle

Purchase an e-copy for $5 or get a print version among more titles by B. C. Brooks

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brunswick Town and Wilmington

 Purchase an e-copy for $5 or get a print version among more titles by B. C. Brooks

 

 

 

 





Sunday, October 07, 2012

Bridges of Seal Cove, Tremont, Maine

This past summer, I took a train to Maine... mainly through the plain.  Sorry... couldn't resist.   Anyway, I did go to Maine.  I was part of a four-person team working on a shipwreck study.  Actually, the ship wasn't technically a wreck, but the result was the same... its remains have slowly decayed in the mud of Seal Cove, Tremont, Maine.  As you can see from the picture, there remains very little.  
Franklin H. Price, a graduate of East Carolina University’s Maritime Studies program (2006) and former resident of Tremont, Maine headed the team.  Price is currently employed as a senior archaeologist with the Florida Bureau of Archaeological Research.  He began the Seal Cove Shipwreck Project last year in coordination with Arcadia National Park and the Institute of Maritime History.  Another member of the crew is Steve Dilk of NewYork and also a graduate of ECU’s maritime program (2012).  A third member is me, Baylus C. Brooks, currently a member of the same program (graduating in 2013) and the Seal Cove project’s historian.  Last, but not least, is Crista Shere, a student at College of the Atlantic, based in Bar Harbor, Maine located at the north end of Mount Desert Island (MDI).

My trip was a most pleasant one, even aside from getting out of North Carolina in the midst of a hot summer.  The temperatures were cool and we never had to run the air.  As a matter of fact, the apartment that we stayed in at Arcadia National Park on MDI did not even have that option!  

As the site historian for the Seal Cove Project, I was tasked with the study of Seal Cove's history.  Part of that history that we guessed pertained to the shipwreck was a lumber mill that sat just behind a bridge on Seal Cove Stream just at the outlet into Seal Cove.  The mill ceased operation, fell out of use by 1909, and was torn down by 1928.

Clipping from Bar Harbor Times and photo from William O. Sawtelle Center at Arcadia National Park
This picture of the old bridge just in front of the mill intrigued me.  The reason that it did so was the bridge that was there now... a sturdy, yet uncomplimentary affair designed with pragmatism in mind and not so much style.  Still, it seemed to sit further back than the one in the Sawtelle photo.  I began to wonder about the bridges that once existed at Seal Cove.

I became fascinated with the bridge’s history and discovered that there have been at least three bridges at Seal Cove outlet.  Aerial photos in 1966 showed the path of the road (Hwy 102) as it crosses the stream and the 1928 bridge just prior to demolition.  

1966 Aerial Photo and a modern-day Google Earth shot of the same location.
The bridges date 1808-1928 (probably more than one), 1928, and 1969.  Kevin McLaggin at the Maine DOT office was very helpful in finding old photos of the three last known bridges, which, by far, show that the 1928 bridge held the most awe-inspiring architectural beauty.  

Pre-1928 DOT photo of the old bridge with the Heath General Store on left and the W.W.A. Heath homestead right background.  The picture is taken from the former lands of Hiram Flye, farmer and shipbuilder and a contemporary of William W. A. Heath. 

1928 Bridge - Photo from Tremont Historical Society Collections
Dating the bridges aided also in understanding the disposition of the mill since it was so closely-related to the oldest known bridge.  In the days before a bridge, access south was obtained by a ford across the cove itself, indicated on Salem Towne Jr’s 1808 map.  So, the first bridge to be built across Seal Cove Stream would had to have been after that.  In fact, there may have been several, since they were composed of wood and decayed faster than modern bridges.  We have no data on those bridges. 

The DOT information was vital in determining the dates of the last two. Plans for the construction of these two bridges show that the last wooden bridge was closest to the cove itself, the 1928 bridge was built just north of the old wooden bridge, and the 1969 bridge was built in a much different location far to the north of the 1928 bridge, to allow for the lessening of the curvature of Highway 102.  

Composite of bridge photos, 1928 plans, and Google Earth image showing the same region.
 In 1969, the present bridge was constructed in a much different location.  As the picture above indicates, Highway 102 was straightened quite a bit to remove the hairpin curve at the entrance to the bridge built in 1928.  The advent of better and faster cars had a great influence on this change no doubt.  Sharp curves had become deadly... they weren't so bad when your horse-drawn carriage was making its way with fresh-cut lumber or produce.  

The plan for the 1969 bridge is below:

1969 Bridge Plan from Maine DOT

Here is the best shot available for this bridge, not nearly as beautiful as the artistic 1928 version:



The best part of researching on Mount Desert Island, mostly a tourist site, was the food.  We had beer, lobster, beer, seafood pizza, beer, and more beer.  And, still, we got some work done.  :)

Well, the trip back home was great!  I got to eat in a pub in Boston that reminded me of Cheers... right outside the train station.  I also got to stroll through Union Station in Washington, DC... a virtual Amtrak-World complete with a Barnes and Noble!  All in all it was a great trip!



-------------------------------------



Hopefully, at the end of 2017, I will be finished with my newest book: Dictionary of Pyrate Biography, 1713-1720 which will attempt for the first time ever to re-discover pirate history without using A General History. I guarantee a lot of surprises!




Please keep up with updates on my website at baylusbrooks.com.




Meanwhile, visit my Lulu page for already published material, including Quest for Blackbeard! 

Quest for Blackbeard is 15% OFF ALL PRINT FORMATS now at: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/bcbrooks

#blackbeard #pirates #history #maritime
=

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Does Your Lost Colony Theory Rely upon a Map Mistake made in 1671?

Just a quick thought about all of those theories about the Lost Colony of Roanoke...

You can't necessarily use old maps showing "Croatan" on the mainland west of Roanoke Island to support your theory that the colonists lived in the swamps of this mainland peninsula... when naming this peninsula "Croatan" was a mistake based on an earlier mistake made by the Roanoke voyagers in the first place!

Two maps (and copies of these) showed "Croatan" where the old Indian town of Dasemunkepeuc used to be.  John Ogilby's map of 1671 was produced for Carolina's new owners, the Lords Proprietors, to facilitate their holdings and settlement in Carolina.  Ogilby never set foot in America and actually was a dance-instructor-turned cartographer who quickly made this map not long before his death.  

John Lawson, on the other hand, HAD visited America, but his engraver, John Senex (who had not), modified Lawson's original manuscript map, removing certain features and possibly filling in details from other maps available in London at the time.  Since Lawson was a deputy of the Lords Proprietors, it is reasonable to assume that he and Senex would have had access to their maps.  Senex may have copied this detail from John Ogibly or, assuming that Lawson was familiar with Ogilby's map already, he may have copied his assumption.  

A comparison of the 1671 John Ogilby map and the 1709 John Lawson/John Senex map - both maps were produced for the Lords Proprietors of Carolina.
The map that probably influenced Lawson's was the earlier map drawn, redrawn and enhanced by four men in London and elsewhere (but NOT America).  Very important to remember is that this map had a different source (Gascoyne's map of 1682) and was, perhaps, not influenced by a misreading of Hakluyt.  It is shown below, compared with Lawson's map of 1709:

Several revisions had already taken place as can be seen in North Carolina Maps' historical note (MC.150.1685w;MARS Id: 3.3.1.1.76): This is the third state of a map originally created by John Thornton at the Platt in the Minories, and Robert Morden at the Atlas in Corn-hill, London. Philip Lea purchased the plate, erased Morden and Thornton from the cartouche, added his own address, and published the second state of the map about 1690. He also erased "Ashley & Cooper River" as a title to the inset. George Willdey purchased the map between 1725-1735, revised the imprint, and published the map otherwise unaltered as the third state. The listing of settlements, details of the rivers, and other interior information are similar to Gascoyne's map of 1682. The soundings and coastline are more similar with the Lancaster 1679 manuscript map. The date 1685 is based on the time that Thornton, Morden, and Lea appear together in publications regarding the map. The map to right is Lawson's version of 1709.
            
Here's a blowup of the Dasemunkepeuc area on the 1685 map:

Where's "Croatan"??  It's not here!  These four guys did not misread Hakluyt.
The only reference made to Croatoans ever having visited this area was when some were accidentally killed there while gathering the left-over corn left by the Indians of Dasemunkepeuc in their hasty retreat from the likes of murderous Ralph Lane.  Governor John White of the last Roanoke Colony (the "Lost Colony") mentioned that they had accidentally killed a couple of their friends, the Croatoans, because of this mistake.  Then, he visited Hatteras Island (then known as "Croatoan") to apologize.  Luckily, the apology was accepted and all was well.  The Croatoan apparently understood that it might be hard for a European to tell a Croatoan from a Dasemunkepeucan.  They were, after all, better nourished and somewhat brighter than the average European.  :)

John Ogilby probably read Richard Hakluyt's details in a Discourse on Western Planting, perhaps between dance lessons, and marked this area, now the location of modern "Beechland," "Mann's Harbor" and "East Lake" as "Croatan" by mistake.  Other map makers, however, read Hakluyt as well and may have not skimmed it too much.  I'm referring to Willdey, Morden, Thornton, and Lea who all four had worked on the 1685 map seen above that Lawson used as a base for his map.  Cartographers were seldom original back then.  

Herman Moll was the only cartographer who used Lawson's map as a base for his own.  You can tell because of the term "Gingite" (modern "Jean's Gite") on the Outer Banks and the unique triangular shape of Hatteras Island which only Lawson's map showed before Moll:

 
1732 Herman Moll map:  Where's Croatan!!??  Moll's been reading his Hakluyt again!  :)


Obviously, Moll read Hakluyt at little closer than Ogilby and left a large blank area in the area of Dasemunkepeuc, even though he copied his map from Lawson!  Why not use "Croatan" there?  Lawson did!  He knew that Lawson had copied his map from Ogilby's who was just flat wrong! That's why. 
 
Aside from Ogilby, Lawson, and the maps that were copied from theirs, there has been no other known written early references to this area called "Croatan" having any association whatsoever with the Croatoan Indians.  

Edward Moseley, not the most careful surveyor (although he was well-educated!), apparently interpreted "Croatan" to be an island in the same general vicinity of Dasemnkepeuc:

Edward Moseley maps of 1733 and 1737

Moseley was only interested in flattering the Lords Proprietors, the King, and the Society for the Propogation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts (SPG)... or the few people he felt were more important than himself.  lol  He hated Lawson, but it looks as though he may have had a copy of his book!  Another "lol" for that one!

The point is... everyone in the eighteenth century misread or misinterpreted each other!
 
Modern maps do not always continue to refer to the area of Mann's Harbor and East Lake as "Croatan," but the body of water between it and Roanoke Island still carries the name of "Croatan Sound."  Obviously, more than one historian and cartographer have fallen for this cartographic faux pas as well.  I know... messed up!

It was simply a mistake made by a London dance instructor in 1671.  If your theory relies on this flimsy evidence, you may want to re-think it... don't rely solely upon Lawson/Senex's map!  The best theory to date was the one that the last eyewitness of the Lost Colony colonists testified upon his return... Hatteras Island, "where the savages of the island [are] our friends," where the Croatoan Indians actually lived and may still live.  Then, there's the Chesapeake in Virginia [which is not my favorite].  At least, come up with some better theory than only a mere map reference to support it.  So much of "Lost Colony" lore is already strewn with fiction.