Donate to Brooks Historical

Sunday, April 05, 2026

“Piracy” of the Industrial Age

 

While the South licked her wounds, the North engaged in a similar endeavor. The first drilling for “rockoil” by Edwin L. Drake on 28 August 1859 in Pennsylvania ushered in the American Industrial Age. During the Civil War in 1863, John D. Rockefeller entered the oil business and soon monopolized control of all oil refineries in Cleveland. In 1870, he began Standard Oil Company. Rockefeller introduced kerosene and gasoline to a country that no longer needed candles to read or horses to pull their carriages. This was a revolution and oil made Rockefeller the wealthiest American of all time and the richest person in modern history – virtually a “god of profit” anointed with the almighty dollar. That’s how Americans saw Robber Barons as they first appeared after the war to possess society. A war-torn nation welcomed their ingenuity and wealth. Like the older discovery of the profit potential of sugar production, the world changed with the discovery of oil. Oil magnates now had more power than any god imaginable and these gods of industry sat upon a “black gold” throne glistening with their new lucrative treasure!

Robber Barons of the following so-called Gilded Age lorded over an era of rapid economic growth, especially in the North and West. It perhaps reflected the old days of piracy in terms of political corruption and corporate financial misdealings, creating many wealthy industrialists who lived extravagant lives. In this time, corporations became the most common form of business and unions began to fight abuse of labor by those corporations. This essentially created the economic stratification we experience today – with a short hiccup brought by FDR’s New Deal in the 1930s and 40s. Although not directly related to the South’s recent abuse of human slave labor, the Gilded Age created an equally abusive period of labor exploitation from a new breed of conservatives – essentially, slavery had been reborn, taking advantage of whites as well as blacks. At least, the new white “slaves” could take comfort in the fact that they would never be viewed as lowly as black slaves in the South! Democratic President Lyndon Baines Johnson later commented upon this notion when he signed the Civil Rights Act in 1964.

Southern conservatives lost the Civil War, but they did “rise again” and their economic ideals and fear of suppression by Northern government found a new home in the next ironically-named “Progressive Era” (1890-1920s), targeting regulation of huge monopolies and corporations – the spawn of those hated Yankees. Some Progressive Era conservative Southern Democrats like William Jennings Bryan and Woodrow Wilson re-awoke racial social conservatism and attempted to maintain segregation, established in Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 – and white supremacist domination over their former slaves and their children. As previously mentioned, during this Progressive Era, occurred the 1898 Wilmington Race Riot – killing as many as 500 African-Americans out of fear of a culturally-hated “Negro Rule.” Newspapers such as the Raleigh News and Observer (think: Fox News) wielded enormous political power over American thought – political piracy in the printed word comparable to another “counterfactual” as written by Johnson-Mist in 1724. They spread this fear of “Negro Rule” as shown in figure 2.

 


Figure 2: A cartoon from an issue of the Raleigh News & Observer, Raleigh, North Carolina from 1898. It shows the political issue that North Carolinians most feared during the special election that year – “Negro Rule” or African-American Rule – an election during which the sitting relatively-liberal governor, Lindsey Russell nearly avoided assassination on a train home to Wilmington to cast his vote! This cartoon depicts an African-American as a bat reaching to grab at fleeing white women. This copy has been annotated with the source and enhanced the caption for easier viewing. For more detail, see LeRae Umfleet, A Day of Blood: the 1898 Wilmington Race Riot (Raleigh: North Carolina Office of Archives and History, 2009).

 

Oddly, they were joined in fighting government corruption by Republicans such as “trustbuster” Theodore Roosevelt. Progressive Era Republicans had forgotten the “Party of Lincoln” sobriquet, but still did not wholly share their Southern counterparts’ racial prejudice at this time. Most Republicans had re-invented themselves from abolitionists (1854-1877) after Reconstruction to follow the new treasure, capitalizing on mostly oil profits and war materiel – though some were still after South American sugar profits. They fought in Progressive politics against not just government “corruption,” as it were, but government control over their business practices – essentially, corporate rights – particularly over the gold standard which they greatly relied upon to turn profits in the “Roaring Twenties.” These Republicans and their wealthy oligarch corporate lords would abuse the markets so much that they actually caused the Great Depression of 1929.

It was the time of “Great Man” redeemer “histories” written by former Confederate soldiers like Attorney-General George Davis, Samuel A’Court Ashe, and William L. Saunders. Redeemers elevated former slavers to “great man” status once again – “Redeemers” or redemption of those who suffered their costly “Lost Cause” a half-century before. “Pirates” retook their status and their history. Again, politically useful “counterfactual” narratives – like those of Johnson-Mist in A General History – returned!

Southern conservative resurgence of this time skewered Edward “Blackbeard” Thache’s reputation the most. The British maintained control over their biased Golden Age narrative from the early eighteenth century, but Americans turned it around and wholly adopted it as their own in “Redeemer” histories. This involved the subtle political manipulation of historical truth as in the “counterfactual” described by Dr. Manushag Powell. Much like Nathaniel Mist writing as “Capt. Charles Johnson” with A General History of the Pyrates, we turned our own historical narrative around 180 degrees for entertainment, but also to demonstrate our new-found technological progress and hide from our violent past. Because of this turn of weaponized history, though, America was robbed of even further social progress! Personally, I suspect that this is when we also stopped enjoying or even learning our history – again, another characteristic that we do not share with our British cousins. We had to suspect that even our basic history was replete with lies and half-truths.

After separation, our own capitalists controlled that narrative for their own purposes from the turn of the nineteenth century. This helped them deflect their corrupt behaviors and to contrast the angelic and racist “Columbia,” who they claimed saved us from these “notorious villains,” into a new era of worthy “American Progress,” our divinely-assured Manifest Destiny! Actually, it still resembled the Carolinian Domitus cultoribus orbis, “to dominate and conquer the world,” as Barbadians anointed for themselves in their Carolina Seal of 1663. Little had changed in the American profiteer mindset. Ask any Native, Central, or South American if you’re so inclined to learn the truth!

Demonizing the old Golden Age “common enemies of all mankind” became a way of demonstrating technological and social advancement brought by the new “champions of industry.” Conquering the pirates of old opened the way for the worship of great feats of capitalism. Again, shiny treasure drew the eye while suppressing the mind. But, it was nevertheless entertaining!

Aiding the efforts of our capitalists in this new anti-historical approach were anti-historical pirate tales of fiction. Robert Louis Stevenson is best known for his classic Treasure Island, an icon of pirate literature that stirred a renewed interest in pirate history – or maritime ahistory – in the late nineteenth century. A look at Stevenson’s changing politics is quite revealing for this period. In 1877, Stevenson was only twenty-six years of age. Before writing his major fictional works, Stevenson at that time reflected on his transformation from a “Socialist” into a quintessential American, as he saw it:

 

For my part, I look back to the time when I was a Socialist with something like regret. I have convinced myself (for the moment) that we had better leave these great changes to what we call great blind forces: their blindness being so much more perspicacious than the little, peering, partial eyesight of men… Now I know that in thus turning Conservative with years, I am going through the normal cycle of change and travelling in the common orbit of men's opinions. I submit to this, as I would submit to gout or gray hair, as a concomitant of growing age or else of failing animal heat; but I do not acknowledge that it is necessarily a change for the better—I dare say it is deplorably for the worse.[1]

 

 


Figure 3: American Progress "Spirit of the Frontier" was painted in 1872 by John Gast (1842-1893) - This representation of Manifest Destiny illustrates the divinely-inspired angelic Columbia. This angelic spirit represents the United States and the expansion out West - as unclothed and "primitive" Native Americans, flee from her. She holds telegraph wire and there is a train in the background symbolizing the industrialization of the West. “Manifest Destiny” was based on the belief of cultural and racial superiority over other peoples - the obligation to bring God, civilization, and enlightenment to other races. The phrase "Manifest Destiny" was coined by the journalist John O'Sullivan in 1845. This imperial notion is most frequently associated with the massive territorial expansion of the United States over just fifty years from 1803 to 1853 and its westward expansion to the Pacific Ocean.

 

The Scottish Stevenson, in 1877, was – like many – excited by “Columbia” and dreams of greatness. He made an effort to become an American and attempted to emulate American upper-class society at the time – i.e., he sought the “American Dream” of capital wealth “beyond the lines of amity” – as did many seventeenth and eighteenth-century Englishman before him in the West Indies. His later novel, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde may have reflected upon his moral struggles at the time. Capitalism won out it appears, much to his own chagrin. Six years later, he penned Treasure Island, originally a tale for boys, but one that invigorated in Americans a broader renewed interest in all things pirate. Treasure Island also made Long John Silver, a nasty pirate of questionable morality and greed, a household figure for the rest of our history. It seems that the inner pirate won the fight within Stevenson’s soul and molded the perfect “pirate” character for Disney’s future film, Blackbeard the Pirate in 1952. This film had done far more damage to Edward Thache’s reputation than even “Capt. Charles Johnson” had ever dreamed!

Johnson-Mist’s “villainous Blackbeard” character arose like a phoenix – or like the South – to new life! Moreover, Confederate redeemers like Samuel A. Ashe found a template on which to damn Edward Thache and other pirates, while also redeeming their Family’s actions in that notorious affair – and establish themselves as truly “great men” of the honorable state of North Carolina! Amateur writers like John Watson of Pennsylvania, ex-Confederate soldier Thomas Upshur of Virginia, and Ellen Winslow of Perquimons County, North Carolina began to speculate on Edward Thache’s origins and intricately weaved him into their local histories. Then, trained historians, like Dr. Hugh Rankin, felt empowered enough by Blackbeard’s alleged evil to officially “trash” the Royal Navy veteran and businessman. Of course, Rankin did not trash Edward Thache for his crude early capitalism, but for the “wicked,” “traitorous,” demonic,” and “notorious” methods and his violation of womanly virtue as A General History’s demonic character Blackbeard. Armed with a century old tradition of the new anti-pirate redeemer “counterfactual,” it became easy for even professional historians like Dr. Rankin to accept that Capt. Charles Johnson’s A General History of 1724 must have been absolutely true! Any mind abused by redeemer rhetoric could easily pick up a copy of Treasure Island and read how all pirates must have truly behaved! This finished any remnants of Thache’s good reputation while, at the same time, it hid American capitalism’s true origins in crude West Indian methods.

The longer these merchant-pirates plundered in America, the greater the returns became; the longer they ignored humanity for the sake of profit, the more unique they became. Over the next few decades, Robber Barons like Rockefeller, Morgan, and Carnegie nearly destroyed our economics with the Great Depression as surely as they destroyed Native American populations for railroad profits. Some of us persevered. Still, we barely survived these piratical corporate forces; but, oddly, we never tried them for their crimes because we couldn’t wholly separate their criminal mindset from the histories we were taught in school! Robber Baron oligarchs were always “too big to fail” or too well accepted as necessary – too much of heroes to America. After all, we were like them – maybe would be them one day – maybe catch some of that “American Dream” profit as it trickled down upon us from the sugar, silver, gold, and “black gold” shiny treasures!

Democracy was hopelessly lost in this treasure-filled maelstrom of greed. Thousands of Native Americans – not to ignore the millions who previously died of disease – died for the “Dream,” the profit – money. As the territory and “outsiders” (ironically, the native population) to conquer faded, so did the focus: our capitalist mercenaries searched inward for new prey. They had the entire Western Hemisphere to capitalize upon, as dictated in the Monrone Doctrine. Remaining focused on treasure, they found ready adherents to the capitalist cause among their own kin. And, the great fortunes that they had been able to amass for themselves accrued with every expedition west and south – sending their agents to steal land, kill Indians, lay rail, and pray to their vengeful god to survive the next Indian uprising in their remote frontier outposts. They merely hoped God’s vengeance would be turned upon their adversaries!



[1] Robert Louis Stevenson, Crabbed Age and Youth and Other Essays (Portland: Thomas B. Mosher, 1907), 11–12.

No comments: